14 Eylül 2012 Cuma

FACE OF THE FUTURE: War Horse's Stephen James Anthony

To contact us Click HERE
Well, I'm late to this party, I know, but when I was looking over things about War Horse when it announced it would close on January 6, 2013, I came across this really good-looking guy.  His name is Stephen James Anthony, and he made his debut in the show way back when it opened.  The rest is history - the show went on to win the Tony for Best Play, and Mr. Anthony went from being a puppeteer (Joey as a colt) to taking on the supporting role of Billy Narracott.

Something tells me this Face of the Future will be back on the boards in no time!


War Horse: Billy Narracott

War Horse: Anthony gives Broadway.com a backstage tour,
introducing us to Joey

Opening night

Stephen James Anthony

Stephen James Anthony
(Click to enlarge these picture!)

Coming SOON: 

  • REVIEW: Forbidden Broadway: Alive and Kicking (Monday)
  • REVIEW: Chaplin: The Musical (Tuesday)
  • JKTS CHAT: Interview with Telly Leung Part 2 (Wednesday)
  • Broadway Box Office: Week 15 (Thursday)



Before you go...
  • ... have you VOTED IN PART 2 OF THE CHAPLIN HOT/HOTTER POLL?  WHO ARE THE HOTTEST LEADS IN THE SHOW?  PLUS! 2 TIE-BREAKERS! VOTING ENDS ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13!
  • ... have you VOTED IN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL?  IT'S BRAND NEW, AND IT'S TO YOUR LEFT!

Jeff4.011Comments? Questions? @jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (Email); or leave a comment below and check a box!

REVIEW: Forbidden Broadway: Alive and Kicking!

To contact us Click HERE
Review of the Saturday, September 8 matinee performance at the 47th Street Theatre, New York City.  Starring David Caldwell, Natalie Charle Ellis, Scott Richard Foster, Jenny Lee Stern and Marcus Stevens. Created and written by Gerard  Alessandrini.  Additional dialogue by Phillip George.  Directed by Phillip George and Gerard Alessandrini.  1 hour 45 minutes, including an intermission.

Grade: B+

After an absence of several years, Gerard Alessandrini and company are back to lampoon all of the latest Broadway shows, Broadway news events, and a few Broadway legends.  It seems no one is left untouched in this latest version of Forbidden Broadway, Alive and Kicking!  As usual, the production values are purposely low, wickedly on point, and seriously funny.  Most of the time, the parody comes from a loving spot (though I'm not sure how Elena Roger would take the way they treat her).  And most of the time the jokes are funnier than you expect, with the lyrics of the show tunes creatively razor-sharp.  Only a few times does the show miss the mark, and just two days after opening night, two bits are already just a tad in need of updating.  Still, fans of Broadway (and even a few foes of such legends as Bernadette Peters, Patti LuPone, Mandy Patinkin and Stephen Sondheim) should take great delight in this fast-paced revue.

David Caldwell
Everything about the production, even the theatre itself, seems to be a parody of Broadway.  The stage, about the size of a dining room table is carpeted, the big spotlights go on and off and do nothing else (and yet you can see everything perfectly - designed by Mark T. Simpson), and even the seats seem to send up the notorious lack of legroom in a Broadway house, though the mezzanine, where we sat this time around is down right spacious compared to the "orchestra" seats!  Speaking of the orchestra, overtures from Broadway's glory days play while we wait for the show to start, and when it does, it is simple a grand piano (which looks even more enormous on that tiny stage).  But that does not keep accompanist David Caldwell from playing the hell out of the score.  Throughout, he keeps things moving at a brisk pace, with a very full sound - he doesn't just play the melody, that's for sure.

As for the rest of the production, one imagines a small army of interns scouring Village vintage shops and Goodwill shops for costume pieces and props, while another small army of assistants to costume designer Phillip Heckman (The Lion King costumes were designed by Alvin Colt) assemble spot-on knock offs and send ups of the real thing!  You may never look at a Snuggie the same way again!  Or a fake beard.  Or chopsticks.  In short, just by looking at the costumes you know right away what they are sending up, and that is no small task. The outfits for The Lion King, Once and Donna Murphy's witch costume from Into the Woods are especially perfect for the occasion.

They say your have really made it on Broadway when your name is above the title, you win a Tony Award and you get your likeness drawn for the walls at Sardi's.  I might add inclusion in Forbidden Broadway to that list.  So congratulations to Steve Kazee, Jeremy Jordan, Norm Lewis, Audra McDonald and Sutton Foster, all of whom are named in the lyrics and are portrayed on stage!  They really lampoon the Tony-winners of that bunch to great success - the angst of Kazee, the histrionic, unintelligible belt of McDonald, the insufferable cheeriness of Foster - amping up what works for all three into riotous excess.

Anything Goes

Smash

Like the costumes, which you recognize immediately, but aren't exact replicas, the cast of four doesn't really attempt Vegas-style impersonations, but rather loving "approximations" that exploit signature characteristics of their targets.  Stephen Richard Foster is really terrific (and a hoot to boot) as Steve Kazee in the Once sequence, and is literally a scream as ANY of the actors who have played Stacee Jaxx in Rock of Ages.  Natalie Charle Ellis is one limber gal, as evidenced by her use of Mr. Foster as a pole upon which to dance in the same sequence.  She also shines as Katharine McPhee in the Smash sequence, and is a stiff as a board Mary Poppins, and her Audra as Bess is too funny, almost insulting if it weren't so exactly right.  Marcus Stevens really gets the ball rolling as Ricky Martin the "Livin' Evita Loca" sequence, nailing that sexy grin and sending up the Latin dance moves with dexterity.  He is also extremely funny as Mandy Patinkin in the Patti/Mandy sequence.  In both cases, his scene partner is the breakout star of the show, Jenny Lee Stern, who makes the most of several roles.  I'm telling you the woman is a chameleon, with the physicality of Lucy and the vocal range any three opera divas.  I laughed til I cried at her wide-eyed "Girl" from Once, and her work as Kelli O'Hara, Sutton Foster and especially Bernadette Peters are a marvel to watch and laugh at.  I also loved her turn as Elena Roger, who is either a really good sport or a complete diva in real life.

Once

Patti LuPone and Mandy Patinkin

Evita

The best line in the whole show is during the Once sequence - "we are so unpretentious we've become pretentious!"  Best non-speaking/singing performance is also from the Once bit - Ellis as Anne Nathan, the accordion-toting mother figure on the show.  I just know when I see that actual show, I am going to giggle every time the accordion plays!  The best back-up dancing has to be the two guys doing the tap dancing during the Anything Goes sketch, complete with not quite masculine sailors, boring repetition and faux breathlessness at the end.  Aside from the Once sequence, which is really a show unto itself, the next best sketches are a tie between the dead-on ridiculousness Nice Work If You Can Get It and its real-life non-chemistry between Broderick and O'Hara (Mr. Stevens and Ms. Stern are so good, you wish it were them playing at the Imperial).  And the other winner is the Patti and Mandy Back on Broadway sequence, which nails Patinkin's self-absorption and true lack of singing ability, along with all the delicious facial contortions of La LuPone.  But the best part of it all is their eewwy-gooey lovey dovey groping of each other as they work so hard to get us to believe they love each other THAT much... "let's make a baby right here" she coos as she dry humps his backside while the lights dim...

Newsies

Less successful bits include the Spider-Man sketch which pits Bono against Julie Taymor, which doesn't work because in reality, they have both become a parody of themselves, and jokes about actor almost dying are inappropriate.  The Annie thing is funny, but not, and probably only included because she's coming back to Broadway soon.  And the Idina Menzel/Wicked number is too well sung... not once does Ms. Ellis go off key.  Has she never seen the infamous Tony Awards segment?  And comments about Jeremy Jordan being the leading man and Audra not doing 8 shows a week worked during previews, but he's not the lead anymore and she's doing all 8 again (allegedly).

But all of that takes up less than 10 minutes, which, compared to the 85 other minutes of near perfection of the rest of the show is reason enough to cheer Forbidden Broadway's triumphant return.  Long may you be alive and kicking!  (I'll come back when you add Chaplin and Bring It On, for sure!)



(Production photos by Carol Rosegg)


Before you go...
  • ... have you VOTED IN PART 2 OF THE CHAPLIN HOT/HOTTER POLL?  WHO ARE THE HOTTEST LEADS IN THE SHOW?  PLUS! 2 TIE-BREAKERS! VOTING ENDS ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13!
  • ... have you VOTED IN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL?  IT'S BRAND NEW, AND IT'S TO YOUR LEFT!

Jeff4.012Comments? Questions? @jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (Email); or leave a comment below and check a box!

REVIEW: Chaplin: The Musical

To contact us Click HERE
Review of the Saturday evening preview performance at the Ethel Barrymore Theatre in New York City.  Starring Rob McClure, Jim Borstelmann, Jenn Colella, Erin Mackey, Michael McCormick, Christiane Noll, Zachary Unger and Wayne Alan Wilcox.  Book by Christopher Curtis and Thomas Meehan.  Music and Lyrics by Christopher Curtis.  Direction and Choreography by Warren Carlyle.  2 hours, 30 minutes with an intermission.

Grade: B+

I fear, and really hope I am wrong, that Chaplin: The Musical will probably go down the same path as last season's Bonnie and Clyde.  Both are bio-musicals about real-life people more beloved for the lore of their stories and the characters they are in our minds than for the way they really were.  I suspect that this musical, like the other, will also have its ardent supporters and is too-dismissive detractors.  The problem with both shows is that a lot of people will go to both thinking they know the story, and will come away disappointed because the story told doesn't match their expectations. As with Bonnie and Clyde, I fall under the category of supporter of Chaplin, though this time somewhat less ardent.  And not because it didn't meet my expectations, but rather because this time around, they are so close to a show that could really resonate far beyond what it does now.  So close it almost hurts to say it isn't quite there.  Don't get me wrong - I really liked the show a lot, and even left humming a tune from it.  I just wanted to "love" it, not "really like" it.  And I hope it lasts longer than Bonnie and Clyde did.

Charlie meets Oona: Rob McClure and Erin Mackey

So let me get my quibbles - I only have two big ones - out of the way first, and leave you with all of the reasons why you should get yourself to the Ethel Barrymore Theatre ASAP.  First, there are a couple of times in the show where I became uncomfortably aware of the book by Thomas Meehan and Christopher Curtis.  In both instances, that realization came during extended sequences where the characters talk to each other, spewing fact after fact to each other, rather than letting information be discovered through the conversation.  What is particularly jarring about these instances is that most of the time the life and times of Charlie Chaplin are revealed in creative, theatrical, and most importantly, musical ways.  So when that doesn't happen it sticks out like a sore thumb.  And funny enough, in both instances, it would have been solved by adding a song for Chaplin's brother, Sydney, played by the fantastic Wayne Alan Wilcox.  Why they didn't give this guy a song or two defies explanation.

The second quibble I have is that the importance of Oona O'Neill Chaplin, both in real life and in the telling of his story here, is so paramount in Chaplin's life that it seems like her part of the story is tacked on at the end.  The character gets maybe 15 minutes of stage time, and yet it is she that finally brings the guy some relief from the pain of losing his mother and his own childhood, which is the primary traffic on the stage throughout the evening.  She also ends his downward spiral into dangerous self-absorption and ego over common sense that nearly cost him his career and his stature as one of the greatest entertainers of all time.  It is another instance of the creatives having a great tool at their disposal (the lovely and very charming Erin Mackey) and  not using her enough.

That said, there is so much to love about Chaplin: The Musical.  And there are even a few times where the show is propelled into the "gloriously wonderful musical theatre moment" category.  I suppose I should confess from the start that I am drawn to shows about the darker side of people, and this show is certainly in that vein.  It reminds me quite a bit in tone and style of Pippin (another show that critics and audiences never really get).  Both are highly stylized storytelling about a real person with real human struggles.  Both are about real people whose lives have taken on mythic proportions, and both are about men whose success nearly causes their demise, if it weren't for the love of another, who sees the man not the myth, and loves him, anyway.


The Transformation:  Charlie Chaplin becomes The Little Tramp
Chief among the show's greatest moments are the truly amazing opening moments of the show.  The show curtain is really a silent film of Chaplin as The Little Tramp standing in an alley staring at us, wide-eyed and mock-innocently.  As the lights dim and the music swells, the film becomes action-packed, morphing into a live stage scene featuring Chaplin precariously balancing on a high wire, while all of the people who are important in his life call out lines and key musical phrases below him.  Eventually, they swirl out from under him, leaving him - for a moment - alone and precariously balanced between life and death.  There is a musical chord, the lights black out and instantly come up again revealing the first scene of the show in stunning black and white, and I do mean stunning.  People literally gasped and then applauded.  Those first moments are among the best openings I have ever seen.  Another such sequence happens when Chaplin nearly loses his job in Hollywood because he just isn't funny.  His desperation gives way to creative genius, and before our eyes - and with just a few power chords of music - Charlie Chaplin the man transforms into Charlie Chaplin the mythic star, known as The Little Tramp.  It was breathtaking to watch - I am covered in goose-pimples just recalling it now.  And a third such triumphant a moment in the show is when Chaplin's series of failed marriages - all to under age girls (were this today, he'd be a footnote and registered sex offender in Hollywood history, not a superstar) - depicted as a boxing match, stylishly staged with the cast holding the rope of the ring while Hedda Hopper provides the play-by-play commentary.

The rest of the show - save for those times when the book scenes take too long that I mentioned above - is stylized with an exciting fluidity and not one but three concepts which change as Chaplin's life does.  Director-choreographer Warren Carlyle has created a constantly moving, interesting pageant of dances morphing into movie scenes, morphing into circus acts, morphing into a sobering final act.  The early moments are punctuated by the set up of the scene as if a movie were being created about Charlie (complete with a chalked clapboard and the call for "quiet on the set").  Then, when his career takes over and he is the one making the movies the scenes take on the conventions of a finished film, and the years roll by (complete with a movie usher, flashlight in hand, directing us to our seats, calling for us to "come see Charlie Chaplin").  And finally, when Chaplin's real life begins to spiral out of control, the show takes on the imagery of a three ring circus, complete with dancing through hoops, walking a tightrope and Hedda Hopper as ring master.  The dances are period looking, but stylized to fit the tone, and are very graceful and, at times, athletic.  They manage, too, to be both panoramic in scope and full of individual moments.  The staging, overall, is superb, really, and often quite thrilling.

Projections designed by Jon Driscoll

The design elements come together

The design team as created a visually stunning production that has the feel of both a modern musical and a big splashy old school Broadway entertainment. Not until a key moment late in the show is there any real hint of color in the show - the entire production looks like a live black and white film, and the effect is magnificent in that it feels like Hollywood in its infancy and it takes on a creepy kind of feel as "real life" takes over from "reel life."  To create this effect, kudos go to Angelina Avallone who created the make-up design, design legends Ken Billington (brilliant lighting design) and the late Martin Pakledinaz (who, along with Amy Clark, created a dazzling array of costumes), and set designer Beowulf Boritt (whose amazing set pieces fly in and out and circle around to us with a cinematic flow).  And finally, to Jon Driscoll who designed the brilliant use of film and projections to heighten the action, bring us into the world of early Hollywood, and to comment on the action, all without interfering with our ability to focus our attention where it needs to be.  It is hard to believe this is the guy who provided the same services for last season's Ghost.

The score, by Christopher Curtis in his Broadway debut, has a little bit of everything in it - from Broadway razzle dazzle to power ballads to catchy concept numbers - all of which feel period and contemporary at the same time, and as they should, the songs support the action and develop the characters.  The lyrics he provides run the gamut from serviceable to creative/poetic and are never cringe-worthy.

The hard-working ensemble, triple threats all, take on many roles each, plus execute the tricky choreography making it look easy.  They were all wonderful, with stand out performances from Justin Bowen, William Ryall and particularly Hayley Podschun as Mildred Harris, Chaplin's first child bride.  The entire ensemble is used to great effect during the last two act one production numbers, "Life Can Be Like the Movies," and "The Look-a-Like Contest."  The latter, a recreation of an actual event, features the ensemble doing Fosse-style dancing, modified tapping, cane tricks, roller skating, violin playing and the most hilarious and clever kick line on Broadway today.

Happy New Year and Happy Wedding Number One!

Among the principal cast, the performances are uniformly good.  Jim Borstelmann makes the most of a small role, the affable assistant Alf Reeves.  I have the feeling that in some earlier version, his role was much larger.  Michael McCormick plays several roles, with Mack Sennett the most prominent.  He gets to sing a clever patter song, "Sennett Song," and handles it smoothly.  He also plays an ominous government official, and brings an interesting character arc to the "Man of All Countries" sequence.  Young actor Zachary Unger gives an amazing performance, both as Little Charlie throughout the show, and as Jackie Coogan, the little waif in The Kid.  That film, and the scene in which the Kid cries for his mother, is painfully recreated in the show, and the young man is heartbreaking.  Sniffles all around and well-earned by the boy, who plays it straight, no cute stuff, no pandering to the audience.  He lets the show do the work for him, allowing him to give one of the best child actor performances I've seen in years.

Mother and Son: Rob McClure, Christiane Noll
and Zachary Unger

Hedda Hopper's Hollywood: Jenn Colella

Even though she gets the penultimate bow at the end, Erin Mackey's Oona gets relatively short stage time.  But she makes the most of it, making it easy to understand why Charlie falls for her and stays with her 30 years and 8 children later.  She has a lovely, clear voice as evidenced by the sweet ballad she sings, "What Only Love Can See." She also makes a strong impression in the show's final moments. Another major lady in Charlie's life was his mother Hannah.  As depicted in the show, she devolves into dementia and is forced to go to a hospital, effectively abandoning her children, as their father is absentee at best.  This separation is key as the events leading up to her hospitalization are what gets him started in show  business, and the separation itself haunts the man until he dies.  A tough role under any circumstances, it calls for a singer, actress, dancer who can glide seamlessly in and out of scenes.  They couldn't find much better than Christiane Noll, who is simply wonderful in the part.  I've never had the pleasure of seeing her perform, and now I can see what all the fuss is about.  When she sings, it is so clear and effortless, and so packed with emotion.  And it says a lot that she can make such an impression just by standing there silently.   Brava.  And the third woman in his life, Hedda Hopper, is played with brassy nastiness and a glorious belt by the always reliable Jenn Colella.  She gets one of the best songs in the show, "All Falls Down," a big show bizzy number that she attacks with gusto.  She also gets my vote for villain of the year; driven to get an interview with Chaplin, who patently refuses her time after time, she digs for anything she can get to hold over him to get that interview.  He still refuses, and with a sneer and venom you can taste in the rear mezzanine, Colella really goes for it, making Hedda a witch and a witch hunter, as Hedda nearly destroys the man with accusations of Communism.  Perez Hilton and TMZ combined don't have the power that this gossip maven had, and Ms. Colella turns in a bravura performance recreating that with glee.

Brotherly Love: Rob McClure and Wayne Alan Wilcox

The most important man in Chaplin's life, his older brother Sydney is winningly brought to the stage by the really terrific Wayne Alan Wilcox, an actor I always enjoy, and who may have just found the vehicle that will take him to the next level.  That he makes such a big impression is no small accomplishment, as nearly every scene he has is with Charlie.  Wilcox is funny, smart and uses his height to his advantage in giving Sydney his due.  As I stated earlier, I just wish he got a song or two to sing.  Trust me on this, Mr. Wilcox is a star on the rise.

Rob McClure as Charlie Chaplin as The Little Tramp

Finally, and most importantly is Rob McClure's performance as Charlie Chaplin.  I have but one word: mesmerizing.  I found myself watching him even when he wasn't the focus.  He is so natural and makes it all seem so effortless, which is no small task given all of the things he has to do - acting, singing and dancing are the usual trio, but add to that roller skating, playing violin, physical comedy chock full of pratfalls, fake punches and at one point being dragged across the stage clinging to a fat rope.  He, and the audience with him, gets lost in his portrayal.  People will be talking about the monumental physicality of the role for the rest of the season, and he really is a master at it all (I can't believe he does it 8 times a week!).  But what might get lost in all the chatter is that as bombastic as the role calls him to be, McClure never forgets the humanity, the pain and the self-inflicted low self-esteem that made Charlie Chaplin the man (not the star) a complicated and often difficult soul.  Mr. McClure's voice is also superb; his gentle "If I Left London" eventually soars, and his "The Life That You Wished For" is heartbreaking.  But get your hankies ready for his 11 o'clock number, "Where Are All the People?" when a defeated Charlie realizes his actions and ego have left him alone.  Talk about a powerful song, and McClure nails it with a belt that gives me goose bumps.  Probably as it should be, he makes Chaplin: The Musical a must-see.

I really hope I am wrong, and that the show gets a long, healthy run.  With a star-in-the making turn by its leading man, and some truly amazing supporting performances, plus a very well presented concept, the show has a real chance to make quite an impression.  Lovers of old style musicals will love its sweeping story and huge production numbers, while those of us who love a modern bite to our shows will love the concept and the fearless portrayal of the painful dark side of one of the world's most adored comedians and filmmakers.

(Production photos by Joan Marcus, used by permission)

Jeff
4.013

JKTS CHAT: Interview with Telly Leung (Part 2)

To contact us Click HERE
Since part one of this interview posted, Telly Leung has begun previews of the Broadway-bound musical, Allegiance.  In Part I, he discussed that show, as well as his time with the revival of Godspell.  In this part, Mr. Leung talks about his time on Glee, working on the original Broadway production of RENT, as well as working with Neil Patrick Harris on the Hollywood Bowl production.  He also tackles the issue of non-traditional casting, and a few more of your questions.


JEFF: OK, the inevitable Glee question.  The show is so slick and well produced, with epic numbers  and amazing vocals each week.  Can you take us briefly through the rehearsal process – from script to final filming?  I imagine it was grueling!  And how was it to work with Darren Criss and Chris Colfer?  How did you manage to escape the Glee Tour? 

TELLY: First of all, from Day One, Darren and Chris were amazing to work with. They are such pros. Shoot days are long and grueling, and I watched those two turn it out take after take. It was really inspiring to watch.

Telly with Darren Criss and Chris Colfer on the set of Glee

Glee days are LONG. Usually, on a set, you are doing 8 hour days or 10 hour days. On Glee, you’re probably looking at a 12 hour day minimum – and usually, it’s more like 16 hours. Shooting a musical (as the folks on Glee and Smash will tell you) is more complicated than shooting a regular TV drama. You have to get the number from all sides, different angles, crane shots, etc. But, the product is well worth it. It can be a stressful environment sometimes, but in the midst of all that stress and exhaustion comes a loopy sense of fun that I think is also captured on screen. I think it’s that sense of fun that audiences for Glee really latch on to when it comes to the musical numbers. Come on – who doesn’t DREAM of having their life be a musical sometimes?!

As for the Glee tour, they asked me to go on the road – and it was hard to say no. However, I had to chose between Glee tour and hanging with my boys in giant 20k stadiums all over the country – or doing the workshop of Allegiance – and I chose to come home and take the time to really develop Allegiance. I think the choice paid off, cuz now I’m in beautiful San Diego, working on the world premiere of this show!

JEFF:  I have worked with and know several Asian-American actors, who lament the lack of roles and the having to wait for places to do The King and I, Miss Saigon and Flower Drum Song in order to find work.  Has that been an issue for you and your career?  How do you feel about the recent controversy surrounding the casting of The Nightingale?  (I’m playing Devil’s advocate here.)  If people are all for non-traditional casting, why is it “wrong” to cast a Caucasian actor as the Emperor in The Nightingale, but “OK” to cast an Asian-American as German child Wendla in Spring Awakening, for example?  Isn’t non-traditional casting the same both ways?  As someone who has already had quite a career and has seen it from all sides, I’m sure, how do you stand on this issue?  

TELLY:  The original intent of non-traditional casting was to give minority actors that do not have a wealth of casting opportunities a chance to work – doing roles that have been traditionally cast as exclusively Caucasian – especially those roles in which race / gender / ethnicity is not germane. I believe in this term and its original intent – which is why I don’t think it really works the other way around. Let’s be real – there are away more opportunities for Caucasian actors. They are the majority. Comparatively, there is very LITTLE work for Asian actors out there – which is why non-traditional casting is important. One day, the situation may be reversed (though highly unlikely). One day, IF there is a minority of Caucasian actors and the majority of actors are (for example) of Asian decent, and the majority of commercial work being produced is cast with only Asian actors – then yes – we will need to make an effort to cast Caucasian actors non-traditionally in roles that are usually cast with Asian actors. But, that’s not the reality – and it’s important to look at the statistics of how many minority actors are actually being considered and hired for projects – especially when the roles aren't race / ethnicity / gender specific.

Allegiance at the Old Globe

JEFF: Back to Allegiance and this issue.  Is there any kind of issue taken within the Asian-American acting community when a play about the Japanese internment camps as three leads from three different nationalities – Japanese (George Takei), Chinese (you) and Filipina (Lea Salonga)?  

TELLY:  At the moment, there’s no issue – atleast not that I’ve heard of. Quite the opposite. I think the Asian community is actually THRILLED that this story is even being produced on a major level, and featuring so much Asian talent – and I’ve gotten nothing but encouragement and praise from my brothers and sisters in the Asian community for Allegiance. The hope is that Allegiance will benefit the community as a whole. Fingers crossed that it’s a successful run in San Diego, which will lead to a long and successful run in New York. Maybe NY will lead to other productions (West End, a tour) – which means more and more work for Asian actors.

The final days of Broadway's RENT

JEFF:  You were also in the closing cast of the Broadway production of RENT.  I’ve seen the DVD preservation of the final performance, and the audience seemed pretty crazy, but totally into it.  What was that whole last week like, performance/audience wise?  While it is great to be a part of such an amazing phenomenon, how was it to come in at the end and close it?  Had you had much experience with the show prior to that?
TELLY:  I saw the original cast of RENT in 1996 when I was in high school, and it totally made me want to do theater. Fast forward 10 years, and I’m standing on that famous line, singing "Seasons of Love" on Broadway. It was a totally full-circle, surreal moment to me. My high school theater dream totally came true. The RENT family is a tight knit group and those final days of RENT was a celebration of 13 years of amazing memories. I feel so honored to be part of a select group of artists that got to work on that show – a show that really changed the way the world thought of music theater. Not only was it an amazing show – it was a cultural phenomenon – and I got to be a part of it. Pinch me! 
RENT at the Hollywood Bowl
Telly with Wayne Brady

JEFF: Simple question: What is it like to work with/for Neil Patrick Harris?
TELLY:  Neil is awesome. I was already such a big fan of his acting work, but he’s also a very gifted director. Neil is part of the RENT family. He played Mark in the West Coast premiere – and even though we never worked on RENT together, there is a bond that exists between members of the RENT family. I was so honored when he asked me to play Angel at the Hollywood Bowl. He wanted to add new members to the RENT family (like Vanessa Hudgens and Wayne Brady), but he also wanted to make sure he had some RENT alums (like me) in the mix, especially with a very short, 10-day rehearsal period. It was such a joy, performing that show for 17,000 people a night! 
JEFF:  Last question from me!  Given that we “met” on Twitter, I assume that you are pro-social media.  As you see it, what are the pros and cons to websites, Twitter, Facebook, message boards and the like as far as being in the entertainment business?  How important a publicity tool is it?  Does it limit your ability to express your true feelings for fear that you’ll get in trouble with fans, producers, etc?
TELLY:  I love social media. It’s humanly impossible for me to connect to everyone who may have an interest in my work – but social media makes it easier. Theater (and the arts, for that matter) is all about connecting to people. It’s about reminding us of our humanity, and the importance of community. Social Media has only HELPED that. 

Here are more of YOUR questions for Telly!
1. Which other track would you have liked to play in Godspell?
TELLY: Uzo and I joke about this. We’ve always wanted to switch roles! I’d kill to sing "By My Side."
2. If you weren’t a performer what would like to do as a career?
TELLY:  Either a translator at the UN (I love languages) or a teacher. I think I still may end up teaching – when I’m done acting. I really love it. 
3. If you could live any other time in history but right now what would it be and why?
TELLY:  I wish I was going to the theater in the 70’s! I wish I could have seen all those original Bob Fosse / Michael Bennett shows. Also – I wish I could have seen what NY was like in those disco lovin’, down and dirty, Studio 54 days. 
4. Mets or Yankees?
TELLY:  Yankees. 
5. New York or L.A.?
TELLY: NEW YORK…. All the way. LA is a great place to work, but NY is where my heart is. 
Thanks for your time, Telly!  It was great getting to know you a little better!


(Photos courtesy of Telly Leung.  Visit tellyonline.net for more on Telly.  Also, visit allegiancemusical.com for more on the show.)

Before you go...
  • ...have you VOTED IN THIS WEEK'S "HOT/HOTTER" POLLS?  IT'S PART 2 OF THE CHAPLIN EDITION! PICK WINNERS FOR 3 CATEGORIES: HOTTEST MALE LEAD, HOTTEST SUPPORTING ACTOR AND HOTTEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS! PLUS! 2 TIE-BREAKERS! POLL CLOSES SEPTEMBER 13! CLICK THE CHAPLIN ICON AT THE TOP LEFT OF THIS BLOG!
  • ... have you VOTED IN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL?  IT'S BRAND NEW, AND IT'S TO YOUR LEFT!
  • ...have you CHECKED OUT MY REVIEWS OF CHAPLIN and FORBIDDEN BROADWAY: ALIVE AND KICKING? CLICK ON THE REVIEWS LINKS TO YOUR LEFT!

Jeff
4.014Comments? Questions? @jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (Email); or leave a comment below and check a box!

Broadway Box Office: Week 15: 09.03 - 09.12

To contact us Click HERE
Broadway Box Office
Week #15 of the 2012 - 2013 SeasonSeptember 3 - 9; 21 Productions



Overall, the Broadway box office was down nearly 6% for Labor Day week.  The 15th week of the season saw one show open (Chaplin), one begin previews (An Enemy of the People) and another close (Gore Vidal's The Best Man).  The opener got mixed reviews, but did jump 9 whole spots up the chart on the strength of its weekly attendance; the closer went out on a high note, making it back into the top 10 one last time.  Looks like the witches of Wicked are having a bit of a "slump," with just 85% of the seats full this week - they haven't been completely sold out in several weeks.  Will it make headlines, like The Phantom of the Opera, when it goes on TKTS for the first time since it was in previews?  Once continues to tear it up, despite not selling out for the week.  In fact, there was only one SRO show this week, The Book of Mormon, which was also, for the first time, top grosser of the week as well, even out selling The Lion King.  Interestingly enough, Mormon didn't set a new record in doing so.  Week 16 will be the first in several weeks that will see no closings, but will see the addition of two more shows in previews: Grace and Cyrano de Bergerac.

To see how this chart is calculated, click the "Box Office" tab at the top of the page.


RANK
THIS
WEEK
SHOW TITLE SHOW
TYPE
THEATRE RANK
LAST
WEEK
UP/
DOWN
1 The Book of Mormon Musical Eugene O'Neill 1 Same
Once Musical Bernard B. Jacobs 5 +3
3 Disney's The Lion King Musical Minskoff 2 -1
4 Rock of Ages Musical Helen Hayes 6+2
5 Jersey Boys Musical August Wilson 9 +4
6 Disney's Newsies Musical Nederlander 6 Same
7 Wicked Musical Gershwin 3 -4
8 Evita Musical Revival Marquis 10 +2
9 Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark Musical Foxwoods 8 -1
10 Gore Vidal's The Best Man Play Revival Gerald Schoenfeld12+2
11 Chicago Musical Revival Ambassador 13 +2
12 Nice Work If You Can Get It Musical Imperial 11 -1
13 tie Chaplin Musical Barrymore 22 +9
13 tie The Phantom of the Opera Musical  Majestic 16 +3
15 Mamma Mia!  Musical Winter Garden 17 +2
16 War Horse Play Vivian Beaumont 15 -1
17 The Gershwins' Porgy and Bess Musical Revival Richard Rodgers 19 +2
18 Mary Poppins Musical New Amsterdam 18 Same
19 Peter and the Starcatcher Play Brooks Atkinson 21 +2
20 An Enemy of the People Play Revival Friedman n/a n/a
21 Bring It On: The MusicalBB Musical St. James 20 -1

SRO Club: The Book of Mormon$1M Club: The Book of Mormon, The Lion King, Wicked. Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark, Evita$100 Ticket Avg.: The Book of Mormon, Once, The Lion King, Wicked, Rock of Ages, Evita
Before you go...
  • ...have you VOTED IN THIS WEEK'S "HOT/HOTTER" POLLS?  IT'S PART 2 OF THE CHAPLIN EDITION! PICK WINNERS FOR 3 CATEGORIES: HOTTEST MALE LEAD, HOTTEST SUPPORTING ACTOR AND HOTTEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS! PLUS! 2 TIE-BREAKERS! POLL CLOSES SEPTEMBER 13! CLICK THE CHAPLIN ICON AT THE TOP LEFT OF THIS BLOG!
  • ... have you VOTED IN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL?  IT'S BRAND NEW, AND IT'S TO YOUR LEFT!
  • ...have you CHECKED OUT MY REVIEWS OF CHAPLIN and FORBIDDEN BROADWAY: ALIVE AND KICKINGCLICK ON THE REVIEWS LINKS TO YOUR LEFT!

Jeff
4.015Comments? Questions? @jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (Email); or leave a comment below and check a box!

Bad sex writing... or rotten erotica

To contact us Click HERE

WARNING: SEXUAL CONTENT AND NAUGHTY WORDS!
With FIFTY SHADES OF GREY such a huge sensation, erotic fiction is the zeitgeist of the day (or is it night?. Not that erotica was ever out of favor per se (I’m sure Erica Jong still outsells George Will), but now more than ever the genre is selling through the roof.

I have never written this form of literature. Not even in an AfterMASH script. Every year some organization comes out with a list of the worst sex scenes in novels and they are excruciatingly uproarious. And it’s sooo easy to fall into that trap. You try to create this turgid mood and be descriptive, but you also try to be original – find new ways to convey sexual acts. Which can lead to a passage like this:

From Ed King by David Guterson:

"In the shower, Ed stood with his hands at the back of his head, like someone just arrested, while she abused him with a bar of soap. After a while he shut his eyes, and Diane, wielding her fingernails now and staring at his face, helped him out with two practiced hands, one squeezing the family jewels, the other vigorous with the soap-and-warm-water treatment. It didn't take long for the beautiful and perfect Ed King to ejaculate for the fifth time in twelve hours, while looking like Roman public-bath statuary. Then they rinsed, dried, dressed, and went to an expensive restaurant for lunch."
Yikes!  And major authors are not immune from writing truly klutzy sex scenes. The great John Updike:

She said nothing then, her lovely mouth otherwise engaged, until he came, all over her face. She had gagged, and moved him outside her lips, rubbing his spurting glans across her cheeks and chin. He had wanted to cry out, sitting up as if jolted by electricity as the spurts, the deep throbs rooted in his asshole, continued, but he didn't know what name to call her. 'Mrs Rougement' was the name he had always known her by.
I’m not sure if I could write one of these passages without a voice in the back of my head saying, “This is the Springtime for Hitler of sex scenes.”

Several renown romance writers read this blog. Somehow they know how to walk that fine line between erotica and Letters to HUSTLER. So some questions to them (and you):

How do you avoid cliches?
Is it possible to write a sexy novel without using the word throbbing at least once?
Comedy writers rarely laugh at what they’ve written. Do romance writers get turned on by their work?
Do editors give you a lot of notes? If this was television, you’d be getting notes like, “Do we like him when he chains her naked to his car?” “Instead of an ice cube, could she use a cold pack?”
Do you need to get in the mood? With my training in television where we're always up against a deadline, I’ve learned to just sit down and crank it out. Can you do that with erotica? Can you drop off the dog to the groomer, pick up the cleaning, come home, empty the dishwasher, then sit down and write TROPIC OF CANCER?
At what point do you realize that imagery is not your friend?
What do you think of FIFTY SHADES OF GREY?
Those are few things I’ve wondered about. Let me know if any erotica writer has a blog with Friday Questions.

But it’s definitely an art. A good sex scene can get you really aroused. More than just watching porn, written material taps into your imagination and can heighten the experience. Unfortunately, if not written well, you’re left with this.

Here are a few more samples of scenes that make me laugh, cringe, and worry I couldn’t write any better:

From Sashenka, by Simon Montefiore:

His hands pulled her dress off her shoulders and he buried his face in her neck, then her hair, scooping up between her legs. He pulled down her brassiere, cupping her breasts, sighing in bliss. 'The blue veins are divine,' he whispered. And in that moment, a lifetime of unease about this ugly feature of her body was replaced with satisfaction. He licked them, circling her nipples hungrily. Then he disappeared up her skirt.
From To Love, Honour and Betray, by Kathy Lette

I kissed his mouth ravenously, devouring his neck, earlobes, chest. He broke free with muscular ease, unhooked my bra with composed expertise, found my nipple and flicked his tongue back and forth until it went hard. His towel fell away. Sebastian's erect member was so big I mistook it for some sort of monument in the centre of a town.
And finally, from another not-too-shabby writer, Paul Theroux:

'Baby.' She took my head in both hands and guided it downward, between her fragrant thighs. 'Yoni puja - pray, pray at my portal.'  She was holding my head, murmuring 'Pray,' and I did so, beseeching her with my mouth and tongue, my licking a primitive form of language in a simple prayer. It had always worked before, a language she had taught me herself, the warm muffled tongue.

9/11 and David & Lynn Angell

To contact us Click HERE

I re-post this every year on this date.
9/11 affected us all, profoundly and in many cases personally. Two of my dear friends were on flight 11. David and Lynn Angell. There hasn’t been a day I haven’t thought of them, missed them, and not felt grateful that they were in my life.David and I worked together on CHEERS, WINGS, and FRASIER (the latter two he co-created). We used to call him the “dean”. In his quiet way he was the one we always looked to for final approval of a line or a story direction. He brought a warmth and humanity to his writing that hopefully rubbed off on the rest of us “schickmeisters”. And he could be funny – sneaky funny. During long rewrite sessions he tended to be quiet. Maybe two or three times a night he’d pitch a joke – but they were always the funniest jokes of the script.

For those of you hoping to become comedy writers yourselves, let David Angell be your inspiration. Before breaking in he worked in the U.S. Army, the Pentagon, an insurance firm, an engineering company, and then when he finally moved out to L.A. he did “virtually every temp job known to man” for five years. Sometimes even the greatest talents take awhile to be recognized.

I first met David the first season of CHEERS. He came in to pitch some stories. He had been recommended after writing a good NEWHART episode. This shy quiet man who looked more like a quantum physics professor than a comedy writer, slinked into the room, mumbled through his story pitches, and we all thought, “is this the right guy? He sure doesn’t seem funny.” Still, he was given an assignment (“Pick a con…any con”) and when the script came back everyone was just blown away. He was quickly given a second assignment (“Someone single, someone blue”) and that draft came back even better. I think the first order of business for the next season was to hire David Angell on staff.

After 9/11, David’s partners Peter Casey & David Lee called me and my partner into their office. There was a FRASIER script David Angell was about to write. (It was the one where Lilith’s brother arrived in a wheelchair and became an evangelist. Michael Keaton played the part.) Peter & David asked if we would write it and for me that was a greater honor than even winning an Emmy.

David’s wife, Lynn, was also an inspiration. She devoted her life to helping others – tirelessly working on creating a children’s library and a center that serves abused children.

My heart goes out to their families. To all of the families.

I still can’t wrap my mind around it.

So tragic, so senseless, and even eleven years later, so inconceivable.